02 May Mastering Explained: The Last Step to a Finished Song
6:00 min read
Your mix sounds incredible in the studio, but thin and too quiet on your phone? Then you’re missing the final step: mastering. What happens during mastering-and whether you should do it yourself or hire a pro-this no-nonsense guide explains it all.
02.05.2026
Mixing vs. Mastering: where the difference lies
These two terms are often mixed up, yet they refer to entirely different stages of the process. During mixing, you work with all the individual tracks: you set volumes, pan instruments across the stereo field, and shape every sound. The result is a finished stereo mix.
Mastering takes that single stereo mix and treats it as a whole. You balance the frequency response, lift the loudness to a competitive level, and ensure the track translates well on every system. Mastering is the bridge between your studio and the world beyond. To see where it fits in the overall workflow, check out our guide to producing songs for beginners.
Key point: mastering can’t fix a bad mix. If the bass booms in the mix, mastering can only mask it-not fix it. The order is sacred: clean mix first, mastering second.

What really happens during mastering
Mastering may sound like secret science, but it relies on just a few tools. An EQ smooths out the frequency response across the entire track, removes harshness, and ensures balance. Gentle compression adds cohesion and punch without crushing the mix.
The process concludes with a limiter that controls peaks and raises overall loudness. Here lies the greatest temptation: making the track as loud as possible. That’s the mistake-modern platforms automatically turn down tracks that are too loud anyway. How much the sound is shaped on its way to the listener is also explored in our feature on the Spotify algorithm.
LUFS and streaming normalization
LUFS stands for the perceived loudness of a track. Unlike raw level, it measures how loud music actually sounds to the human ear. And that’s exactly what streaming services use as their guide.
Spotify, Apple Music and others normalize all tracks to a similar loudness target so no one gets startled when switching between songs. The consequence: mastering a track brutally loud gains nothing-instead, it only sacrifices dynamics and sound quality. A better approach is a master that sounds clean at the target level and still has room to breathe.
DIY or Pro: When Each Makes Sense
Pros: free, you learn a lot, available instantly, full control.
Cons: needs good monitoring and experience, blind spots for your own material.
Pros: fresh ears, neutral monitoring, fast and competitive results.
Cons: costs money, AI services don’t suit every style, less control.
Honest advice: For practice and demos, master it yourself-it sharpens your ears enormously. For a major release that needs to stand up against professional productions, hire an experienced mastering engineer or at least use a solid online service. If you go solo, invest in reliable monitoring, as our comparison of studio monitors and headphones shows.
Q&A after the show
Click a question to reveal the answer.
What’s the difference between mixing and mastering?
What LUFS target should I aim for when mastering?
Are AI mastering services good enough?
Can mastering fix a bad mix?
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Editorial IBS Publishing
Producing your first song: from the first beat to release →Studio monitors or studio headphones for your home studio →Setting up your home studio: interface, DAW, and acoustics →Understanding the Spotify algorithm: how songs land on playlists →DAW comparison for beginners: Ableton, FL Studio, Logic, and Reaper →
Featured image source: Pexels / Fortal Fototeca (px:33204438)
Image in article: AI-generated (May 2026)